Legal Opinion
Menken v. Emm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 19, 2007No. 05-16467PublishedCited by 197 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge SEABRIGHT; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge BYBEE.
*1054SEABRIGHT, District Judge.
On December 12, 2003, Plaintiff-Appellant David Menken (“Menken”) filed a Complaint in Arizona state court alleging negligence, interference with contractual relations, civil extortion, and a violation of Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) § 33-420. Defendant-Appellee Tomerlin removed the case (based on diversity of citizenship) to the United States District Court for the District of Arizona on March 24, 2004.1 The district court dismissed for lack of personal jurisdiction.
Because we…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Calder v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Schwarzenegger v. Fred Martin Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by197 opinions
- CollegeSource, Inc. v. AcademyOne, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Freestream Aircraft (Bermuda) v. Aero Law GroupCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Ott v. Mortgage Investors Corp. of Ohio, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2014
- Wells Cargo, Inc. v. Transport InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2009
- Rupert v. BondDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
192 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.