Legal Opinion

Malcolm v. Larson

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 8, 1944No. 36,095PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Thiele, J.:

The question in this appeal is whether the trial court erred in denying plaintiff’s motion to dismiss defendant’s cross petition for want of jurisdiction.

On January 23,1943, plaintiff commenced his action in the district court. The petition alleged that plaintiff was the duly appointed, qualified and acting administrator of the estate of Albert Renspeas, who died November 6,1942, being at the time of his death the owner *424of certain personal property of the reasonable value of: $957.50, an exhibit being attached showing the items and value of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Egnatic ex rel. Egnatic v. WollardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  2. Pennsylvania R. Co. v. Musante-Phillips, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1941
  3. Muckenthaler v. NollerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  4. McCarthy v. SinkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  5. Lyman v. StantonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Houdashelt v. SweetSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
  2. Hudson, Administrator v. TuckerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1961
  3. Western Shale Products Co. v. City of Fort ScottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1954
  4. In Re Estate of BowmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1951
  5. Salvation Army v. Estate of PryorCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API