Legal Opinion

People v. Hamilton

California Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1969No. Crim. 12642Published

1Opinion of the Court

71 Cal.2d 176 (1969)

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

NORA MAE HAMILTON et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Crim. No. 12642.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

May 28, 1969.

Marshall Miles and Alan T. Selznick, under appointments by the Supreme Court, for Defendants and Appellants.

Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General, William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, and Frederick R. Millar, Jr., Deputy Attorney General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

SULLIVAN, J.

Defendants were charged by information with possession of heroin (Health & Saf. Code, 11500) and in a second count with possession for…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Giordenello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Jaben v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. People v. SesslinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API