Legal Opinion

City of Tulsa v. Clifford

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided February 23, 1990No. S-89-606PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JOHNSON, Judge:

The facts of this State appeal are undisputed. On February 6, 1989, two Tulsa Police Officers stopped a motor vehicle for operating with an expired license tag. The owner of the vehicle, appellee, was a passenger. A routine records check revealed an outstanding warrant for a James Clifford. However, the arrest warrant contained the identical physical description and police identification number of appellee. Tulsa Police Department records also confirmed a file on appellee and showed the name of James Clifford as an alias.

When advised of the warrant, appellee claimed that…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hill v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Anthony A. Brown v. Officer L. PattersonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  3. United States v. Jimmy F. McEachernCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
  4. State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  5. United States v. Fred M. Glover AKA BlackbusterCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Salazar v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  2. Phillips v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1999
  3. State v. GreenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999
  4. State v. ChaneyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999
  5. City of Tulsa v. CliffordCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API