People v. Ooley
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MARTIN, J.
Defendant was charged with burglary. (Pen. Code, § 459.) His motion to suppress evidence seized at the time of his arrest was denied. The information was then amended to add an allegation that defendant suffered a prior felony conviction. (§ 667.5, subd. (Jo).) Thereafter, this court denied defendant’s petition for writ of prohibition and/or mandamus. Pursuant to a plea bargain, defendant then pled guilty to the burglary charge, and the alleged prior felony conviction was dismissed. Defendant was sentenced to state prison for the upper term of three years for second degree…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Rawlings v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. SalvucciSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. BrendlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- People v. MorenoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- People v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- People v. LamontCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.