Heidtman Steel Products, Inc. v. Faurecia Automotive Seating, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JAMES G. CARR, Senior District Judge.
This is a breach of contract case in which plaintiff/counter-defendant, Heidtman Steel Products, Inc. (Heidtman), claims defendant/counter-plaintiff, Faurecia Automotive Seating, Inc. (Faurecia), failed to pay money due under the parties’ contract. Faurecia counterclaimed, alleging Heidtman also breached the contract and that it is entitled to an appropriate setoff.
Pending is Heidtman’s motion to dismiss Faurecia’s counterclaims (Doc. 70). For the reasons that follow, I deny the motion.
Jurisdiction exists under 28 U.S.C. § 1332.
Background
Heidtman…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Klapp v. United Insurance Group Agency, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
- Quality Products and Concepts Co. v. Nagel Precision, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 2003
- Neibarger v. Universal Coopertives, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Miranda v. Xavier UniversityDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2022