Legal Opinion

MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. Tracy

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 31, 1992No. Nos. 92AP-966, 92AP-967, 92AP-968 and 92AP-969PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCormac, Judge.

Appellant, MCI Telecommunications Corporation (“MCI”), appeals the decisions of the Ohio Board of Tax Appeals (“BTA”), wherein the BTA affirmed the final determinations of the Ohio Tax Commissioner, appellee, regarding appellant’s public utility excise tax, or “gross receipts tax,” liability for report years 1983, 1985, 1986 and 1987. The appeals for the above years are consolidated herein. Report year 1984 is not before us, as appellant has a claim for refund for that year currently pending before the Tax Commissioner.

Beginning with report year 1983, appellant was required to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1983
  2. Lawrence v. State Tax Comm'n of Miss.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Cleveland Gear Co. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Board of Education v. Fulton County Budget CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  5. 3535 Salem Corp. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pica Corp., Inc. v. TracyOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
  3. State v. FairclothOhio Court of Appeals · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API