Legal Opinion · Dissent

Vertrees v. State Board of Elections

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1919Published

FROM DAVIDSON. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Davidson County. — HoN. James B. Newman, Chancellor.

1DissentBachmaN, J.

While it is clear that the legislature may, under the provisions of our Constitution, and especially by virtue of section 4 of article 7 thereof, extend the right of suffrage to women in elections for officers not contemplated by the Constitution, I am of the. opinion that the suffrage act under consideration (chapter 139 of the Acts of 1919) does not present a constitutionally valid ■ exercise of legislative authority, for the reason that it is discriminatory and violative of article 11, section 8, of the Constitution. Under our Constitution women may be lawfully subjected to the payment of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Malone v. WilliamsTennessee Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Stratton v. MorrisTennessee Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Coggeshall v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  4. Attorney General ex rel. Conely v. Common CouncilMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Kinneen v. WellsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API