Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Lyons
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
When the amended answer was served it eliminated from the action, the pleading it was intended to supersede. The previous pleading is dead and the case stands as if the pleading had never been served. The amended answer does not contain the *821allegations that were set forth in defendants’ original pleading as to which plaintiff sought amplification. Hence to preclude defendants from offering any evidence on the trial of the action in relation to the matters embraced in the demand for the bill of particulars will unduly prejudice defendants in their defense of the suit. Order of preclusion…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Rifkind v. Web IV Music, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1971
- R. J. Marshall, Inc. v. Turner Construction Co.New York Supreme Court · 1954
- Stewart v. StraussCity of New York Municipal Court · 1958
- Van Valkenburgh, Nooger & Neville, Inc. v. John F. Rider Publisher, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1965
- Schneidman v. StecklerNew York Supreme Court · 1958