Legal Opinion

Shea v. Goldstein (In Re Goldstein)

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided May 26, 1999No. 19-10768PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

JAMES F. QUEENAN, Jr. Bankruptcy Judge.

These adversary proceedings stem from a fee-sharing agreement between two lawyers, Kevin J. Shea, Esq. (“Shea”) and Arthur Goldstein, Esq. (the “Debtor”). At the heart of both cases is this question: When the Debtor agreed to pay Shea one-third of each fee payment he received under a structured settlement, did the Debt- or thereby create a trust for the benefit of Shea? Also at issue is the effect which delivery of a promissory note for some of the debt has upon the nature of the debt and hence its dischargeability.

In Adversary Proceeding…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Cadle Co. v. HayesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
  3. Desmond v. Varrasso (In Re Varrasso)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
  4. In the Matter of Nancy S. Marchiando, Debtor-Appellee. Appeal of State of Illinois, Department of the LotteryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  5. In the Matter of Barry Woldman, Debtor-Appellee. Appeal of Geraldine JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Staniunas v. Delisle (In Re Delisle)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API