Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Rothman

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 19, 1973No. Appeals, 794 and 876PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Spaulding, J.,

Appellant David S. Rothman was convicted of forgery, uttering a forged instrument and conspiracy by a Montgomery County jury. He appeals from the order of the court below denying his motions for arrest of judgment and for a new trial, contending that the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to support his conviction.

On May 3, 1971, appellant drove up to the drive-in window of a bank in Bala-Cynwyd, Pennsylvania. On reaching the teller’s window, the front-seat passenger accompanying him 1 endorsed the back of a check and handed it to appellant in the drivex*’s…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  2. Commonwealth v. OwensSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  3. Commonwealth v. MarinoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Commonwealth v. ClintonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  5. Commonwealth v. DONALDSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. KellySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Commonwealth v. CarterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Commonwealth v. FreySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Commonwealth v. GibsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Fiumara v. FiumaraSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API