Legal Opinion

Crisman v. Fedility Health & Accident Mutual Ins.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 16, 1950No. 4410Published

1Opinion of the CourtCarpenter, J.

A judgment for plaintiff, Emma J. Chrisman, in an action based on a policy of health and accident insurance issued by defendant, Fidelity Health & Accident Mutual Insurance Company, was the occasion for this appeal on question of law.

The facts were undisputed. October 17, 1940, on application of plaintiff, defendant issued to her a health and accident policy. December 24, 1945, by riders the insurance was extended to include additional hospital benefits, medical and surgical expence indemnity which were subject to all other conditions and provisions of the policy contract.

One of the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mutual Ben. Health & Accident Ass'n v. BlaylockMississippi Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Conaway v. Life Ins. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Stewart v. Hoosier Casualty Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API