Cox v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
GUNN, Presiding Judge.
After an evidentiary hearing, movant’s Rule 27.26 motion alleging ineffective assistance of counsel was denied. His appeal importunes that the trial court erred in failing to find that he was deprived of a fair trial on a burglary charge by reason of his counsel’s failure to represent him properly. We find no error and affirm.
Movant was convicted of second degree burglary, and his conviction was upheld in State v. Cox, 527 S.W.2d 448 (Mo.App.1975). *632His 27.26 motion charges that his trial counsel only conferred with him on a single occasion for 15 minutes, 10 days before…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Roger Lee McQueen v. Harold R. Swenson, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
- Babcock v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
- Aikens v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
- Haynes v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
- Stevens v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sweazea v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
- Gardner v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
- Clark v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
- Campbell v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
- Couch v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.