Legal Opinion

Sweazea v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 2, 1979No. 40244PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GUNN, Judge.

Movant appeals the trial court’s denial of his Rule 27.26 motion without evidentiary hearing. The motion arises out of movant’s conviction for first degree robbery and second degree burglary, affirmed in State v. Sweazea, 555 S.W.2d 670 (Mo.App.1977). His appeal charges that the trial court erred in failing to appoint counsel to assist in the preparation of his motion, in failing to hold an evidentiary hearing and failing to make findings of fact and conclusions of law. We affirm.

Movant relies on Fields v. State, 572 S.W.2d 477 (Mo.banc 1978), which mandates that the trial court…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Fields v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  2. Haliburton v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. Baker v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
  4. Charles v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. Sherrill v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  2. Thomas v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  3. Joiner v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Bannister v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Warren v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API