Legal Opinion

Cornick v. Stry-Lenkoff Co.

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided August 19, 1955No. Civ. A. No. 2794PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHELBOURNE, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff Morris Corniek, a resident of Chicago, Illinois, instituted this action June 18, 1954, against the defendants Stry-Lenkoff Company, a Kentucky corporation and Lee Lenkoff, its president, invoking the jurisdiction of the Court under the patent laws, Title 35 of the U. S.Code, and under Title 28, § 1338(b), alleging diversity of citizenship and a controversy involving an amount in excess of $3,000, exclusive of interest and costs.

Plaintiff alleged ownership of the entire right, title, and interest to United States Design Letters Patent D-171,441 issued to the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Nat Lewis Purses, Inc. v. Carole Bags, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
  3. Application of BigelowCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952
  4. Hotchkiss v. Samuel Cupples Wooden-Ware Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1891
  5. Acton MFG. Co., Inc. v. Louisville Tin & Stove Co.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Smith Welding Equipment Corp. v. PearlDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1956
  2. Maskery v. KoppDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1976
  3. Melva L. Imbert v. Louis W. Sullivan, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API