Legal Opinion

Anthony Tile & Marble Co. v. H. L. Coble Construction Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 20, 1972No. 7226SC768PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Judge.

Defendant Coble assigns as error the trial court’s failure to grant his motions for directed verdict and asserts among his contentions that there was insufficient consideration to support any modification extending the time required to secure a performance and materials payment bond under the agreement of 28 August 1969.

Parties to a contract may by mutual consent agree to change its terms and a written contract may ordinarily be modified by a subsequent parol agreement and such subsequent agreement may be either express or implied by conduct of the parties. But to be effective…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sinclair v. TravisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. Electro Lift, Inc. v. Miller Equipment Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
  3. Russell v. . Hardwood Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  4. Ford Motor Credit Company v. JordanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Zinn v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  2. Burton v. KenyonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  3. NRC Golf Course, LLC v. JMR Golf, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  4. Penn Compression Moulding, Inc. v. Mar-Bal, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  5. Fletcher v. JonesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API