Ozimek v. Staten Island Physicians Practice, P.C.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
On March 10, 2007, the plaintiff Nancy A. Ozimek (hereinafter the injured plaintiff) underwent a mammogram at the office of the defendant Staten Island Physicians Practice, PC. (hereinafter SIPP). The mammogram was studied by the defendant Shashikant Kulkarni, a radiologist employed by SIPP In letters to the injured plaintiff dated March 22, 2007, and June 9, 2007, *834respectively, Kulkarni informed the injured plaintiff that the mammogram “showed a finding” that required additional examination, and requested that the injured plaintiff contact his office to schedule an “important follow-up…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cox v. Kingsboro Medical GroupNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Watkins v. FrommAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Texeria v. BAB Nuclear Radiology, P.C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Cherise v. BraffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Mule v. PeloroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.