Legal Opinion
Freel v. Ozark-Mahoning Company
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided August 29, 1962No. Civ. A. 6928PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DOYLE, District Judge.
The above-entitled action was tried to the Court on August 21 through August 23, 1962. The Court now finds the facts and concludes as follows:
I
THE PLEADINGS AND ISSUES
The action seeks damages for injury to property resulting from contamination and pollution of a stream and from alleged flooding of the plaintiffs’ lands as a result of failure to contain mine tailings ponds.
The complaint alleges that the plaintiffs are owners of described property in Boulder County, which is known as Curie Springs, or Springdale, and that they have been operating this property as a health…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Mustang Reservoir, Canal & Land Co. v. HissmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1910
- Big Five Mining Co. v. Left Hand Ditch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1923
- Fort v. Brighton Ditch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1926
- State v. NichollSupreme Court of Colorado · 1962
- Dandrea v. BOARD OF COUNTY COM'RS OF EL PASO COUNTYSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960
3Cited by3 opinions
- Weld County Bd. of County Com'rs v. SlovekSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- The City of Boulder, a Colorado Municipal Corporation v. Eleanor B. Snyder, Paul D. Huntley, and Eileen HuntleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
- Weld County Bd. of County Com'rs v. SlovekSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986