Legal Opinion

Medallion Oil Co. v. Hinckley

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 30, 1937No. 8302PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEALY, Circuit Judge.

The appellant brought suit to determine and quiet its title to certain oil lands and leases, for an accounting, for the appointment of a receiver, and for general equitable relief. From an adverse judgment in the court below, this appeal was taken.

While the record is voluminous, it permits of a fairly brief summary of the salient facts.

W. H. Ochsner was a consulting geologist. W. P. Dunham was a financier and promoter. In January, 1910, a contract was made between Dunham and Ochsner, pursuant to which Ochsner was employed by Dunham for the purpose of prospecting oil…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Twin-Lick Oil Co. v. MarburySupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. United States v. Midwest Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Johnston v. Standard Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. Patterson v. HewittSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  5. Trice v. ComstockCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Pyle v. FerrellIllinois Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Appleman v. Kansas-Nebraska Natural Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
  3. Adkins v. ArshtDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1943
  4. Forbes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942
  5. Chicago, Wilmington & Franklin Coal Co. v. JilekDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API