Legal Opinion
In re Bar Applicant ADM-2004-176
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided August 18, 2005No. ADM-2004-176PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Per curiam
The applicant seeks admission to the New Hampshire Bar. The standing committee on character and fitness of the New Hampshire Supreme Court (committee) filed two adverse reports recommending that the applicant be denied admission. We issued an order instructing the applicant to show cause why his application should not be denied. See Sup. Ct. R. 42(5)(k). Thereafter, both parties were allowed to file briefs or memoranda, and oral argument was held. We now deny the application.
Supreme Court Rule 42(5)(a) states: “All persons who desire to be admitted to practice law shall be required to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners of NMSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Application of FeingoldSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
- Lane v. Bar Commission of the Nebraska State Bar Ass'nNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
- In Re ConverseNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
- In re Application for Admission to the Bar of the CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Farva Jafri v. New Hampshire Supreme Court Committee on Character and Fitness, et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2022
- Jafri v. NH Supreme Court Committee on Character and FitnessDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2022
- Jafri v. NH Supreme Court Committee on Character and FitnessDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2022