Legal Opinion

Cotton v. Wiscasset, Waterville & Farmington Railroad

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided March 25, 1904PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Agreed statement. Action to recover the statute penalty for failing to erect and maintain a sufficient fence. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtSpear, J.

This is an action brought under R. S. (1883), c. 51, §§ 36 and 37, to recover of the Wiscasset, Waterville and Farming-ton Railroad Company a forfeiture of one hundred dollars for the failure, on the part of said company, after due notice, to repair their fence along the line of said railroad, adjoining the plaintiff’s premises. The case comes up on the following agreed statement of facts: “It is admitted that Sarah W. Cotton was the owner in fee simple of real estate described in the writ, on the sixth day of May, 1902, and for a long time prior thereto, and still is the owner of such real…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. McNeel v. FolkWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Morton v. HaydenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1958
  3. Morton v. HaydenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1958
  4. State v. KoplowSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API