Legal Opinion

Let's Go Aero, Inc. v. Forcome, Ltd.

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided September 5, 2024No. 1:23-cv-00045Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Regina M. Rodriguez Civil Action No. 23-cv-00045-RMR LET’S GO AERO, INC., Petitioner, v. FORCOME CO. LTD., Respondent. ORDER This matter comes before the Court on Petitioner Let’s Go Aero’s (“LGA”) Motion for Attorney Fees, ECF No. 37. LGA seeks an award of $47,933.00 in attorneys’ fees and $21,854.13 in costs. For the reasons stated herein, LGA’s motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. I. BACKGROUND1 In 2014, LGA and Forcome entered into a Manufacturing Agreement. Under the Manufacturing Agreement, LGA was to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Fox v. ViceSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Hardt v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. Ramos v. LammCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API