Legal Opinion

Pearson v. Oregon-Washington Railroad & Nav. Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 1931PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

The single question presented for determination in this cause arises out of the plaintiff’s objection to the order of the court directing a reference of the case for trial, which he asserts has resulted in the denial to him of “both the constitutional and common-law right to a jury trial.”

Oregon Code 1930, § 2-602, provides:

“When the parties do not consent, the court may, upon the application of either, or of its own motion, direct a reference in the following cases:
“(1) When the trial of an issue of fact shall require the examination of a long account on either side, in which case the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Fletcher v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
  2. Parsons v. Bedford, Breedlove, & RobesonSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
  3. Tribou & McPhee v. StrowbridgeOregon Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Salem Traction Co. v. AnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Kaston v. PaxtonOregon Supreme Court · 1905

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Flaherty v. BookhultzOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Flaherty v. BookhultzOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Pearson v. Oregon-Washington Railroad & Nav. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API