Legal Opinion
Pearson v. Oregon-Washington Railroad & Nav. Co.
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided January 6, 1931PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
The single question presented for determination in this cause arises out of the plaintiff’s objection to the order of the court directing a reference of the case for trial, which he asserts has resulted in the denial to him of “both the constitutional and common-law right to a jury trial.”
Oregon Code 1930, § 2-602, provides:
“When the parties do not consent, the court may, upon the application of either, or of its own motion, direct a reference in the following cases:
“(1) When the trial of an issue of fact shall require the examination of a long account on either side, in which case the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Fletcher v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
- Parsons v. Bedford, Breedlove, & RobesonSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
- Tribou & McPhee v. StrowbridgeOregon Supreme Court · 1879
- Salem Traction Co. v. AnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1902
- Kaston v. PaxtonOregon Supreme Court · 1905
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Flaherty v. BookhultzOregon Supreme Court · 1956
- Flaherty v. BookhultzOregon Supreme Court · 1956
- Pearson v. Oregon-Washington Railroad & Nav. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1931