Legal Opinion

Pierino v. Miner

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided November 20, 1956No. File No. 10219PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By writ, summons and complaint dated August 1, 1956, and served on that day, as appears from the officer's return, the plaintiff brought the within action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained on August 2, 1955, when bitten by a dog alleged to have been owned by the defendant. The writ designates the return day of the action as "the first Tuesday of August, 1956." It has been made to appear that the action was returned to the clerk's office and accepted as if it were a September case, although the jacket of the file lists the action as one brought on the first Tuesday of August,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Consolidated Motor Lines, Inc. v. M & M Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
  2. Young v. MargiottaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
  3. Denison v. CraftsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1901

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ginise v. ZahariaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. Vierra v. Uniroyal, Inc.Connecticut Superior Court · 1970
  3. Karp v. Ray-N-Beau Construction Co.Connecticut Superior Court · 1972
  4. Karp v. Ray-N-Beau Construction Co.Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API