Legal Opinion

Takizo Motonaga v. Tokumatsu Ishimaru

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1948No. 2668PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

LE BARON, J.

The plaintiff brought ejectment against the defendant for restitution of a one-half portion of a leasehold. After trial, jury waived, the trial judge rendered decision in favor of the plaintiff and entered judgment accordingly for possession and damages.

Aside from painstakingly attacking various reasons for restitution advanced by the trial judge in his decision and findings made therein, the assignment of errors presents but one paramount question, the answer to which is decisive of the appeal. That question challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Neale v. NealesSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  2. Fried v. FisherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Faxton v. FaxonMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Whitney v. HaySupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  5. Riggles v. ErneySupreme Court of the United States · 1894

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Applications of Herrick and IrishHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Waterhouse v. Capital Investment Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Island Holidays, Inc. v. FitzgeraldHawaii Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Filipo v. ChangHawaii Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Cosmopolitan Financial Corp. v. RunnelsHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API