Legal Opinion
City of Las Vegas v. Walsh
Nevada Supreme Court
Decided June 11, 2004No. 41317PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
This case involves the admissibility of an affidavit of a registered health professional pursuant to NRS 50.315(4). At the outset of the trial, the City of Las Vegas requested that the municipal court admit the affidavit of a registered nurse who withdrew Mike Gehner’s blood. The municipal court ruled that certain facts contained in the affidavit were not admissible, and thus, the nurse would need to testify. The City then filed a petition for a writ of mandamus requesting the district court to compel the municipal court to admit the nurse’s affidavit in its entirety. The district…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- State v. RiveraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- People v. MoscatCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2004
- City of Reno v. Reno Gazette-JournalNevada Supreme Court · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by20 opinions
- Commonwealth v. VerdeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
- State v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2005
- City of Las Vegas v. WalshNevada Supreme Court · 2005
- United States v. MagyariCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
- People v. LonsbyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.