Legal Opinion

State v. Jeppesen

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided October 23, 2002No. 27414PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EISMANN, Justice.

The defendant appeals the magistrate judge’s issuance of a permanent no contact order as part of the defendant’s sentence for disturbing the peace. We vacate the no contact order.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On December 20, 1999, the State charged the defendant Darwin Jeppesen with the offense of stalking in violation of Idaho Code § 18-7905. The victim of the alleged stalking was Judy Jeppesen, his wife. Pursuant to a plea agreement, that charge was amended to disturbing the peace in violation of Idaho Code § 18-6409. On July 13, 2000, Jeppesen pled guilty to the amended…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. RhodeIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. CharboneauIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Head v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State v. CannadyIdaho Supreme Court · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Verska v. Saint Alphonsus Regional Medical CenterIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
  2. State v. Timothy Alan DunlapIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
  3. State v. Erik Virgil HallIdaho Supreme Court · 2018
  4. State v. RoseIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. FlowersIdaho Supreme Court · 2011

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API