Levestone v. Bortel
District Court, W.D. New York
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Shaun Levestone, Plaintiff, REPORT and RECOMMENDATION v. 21-CV-6461-EAW-MJP Bortel et al., Defendants. INTRODUCTION Pedersen, M.J. All litigants—including pro se litigants—must comply with court orders. Baba v. Japan Travel Bureau Int’l, Inc.,
165 F.R.D. 398, 402
(S.D.N.Y.1996), aff’d,
111 F.3d 2
(2d Cir. 1997) (quoting McDonald v. Head Crim. Court Supervisor Off’cr,
850 F.2d 121, 123
(2d Cir. 1988). “When [a pro se litigant] flout[s] that obligation they, like all litigants, must suffer the consequences of their actions.”
Id.
(alterations…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Shirley Small v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Barry Lesane v. Hall's Security Analyst, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Paterson-Leitch Company, Inc. v. Massachusetts Municipal Wholesale Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- Lucas v. MilesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.