Legal Opinion

Barnett v. Gladden

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1964PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPerry, J.

This is an appeal by the petitioner from the denial of the relief sought in a post-conviction hearing as provided in ORS 138.510 et seq.

The record in this proceeding discloses that on March 21, 1960, the petitioner was indicted in Umatilla County, Oregon. The charging part of the indictment reads as follows:

“The said John H. Barnett, on the 13th day of March, A.D., 1960, in the County of Umatilla and State of Oregon, then and there being, and then and there being a male person over the age of 16 years, to-wit, 62 years of age, did then and there wilfully, wrongfully, unlawfully and…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. The People v. AllenIllinois Supreme Court · 1937
  2. State v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Smallman v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Brooks v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  5. In Re Application of HarronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Wikberg v. HendersonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1974
  2. Merlin Ohlinger v. Robert J. Watson, Administrator, Corrections Division of the State of OregonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  3. Lerch v. CuppCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
  4. Richardson v. WilliardOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  5. State v. FreemanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API