Legal Opinion
Boyd v. Newland
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 25, 2006No. 03-17098PublishedCited by 94 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The Amended Opinion filed on June 26, 2006, slip op. at 7011 [455 F.3d 897], and published at 455 F.3d 897 (9th Cir.2006), is amended as follows:
On slip opinion page 7032 [455 F.3d at 907], line 20, after the sentence ending “entire voir dire transcript” add:
A transcript of the complete voir dire, as distinct from a partial transcript up to the time of the Batson motion, is proper because comparative juror analysis is appropriate both at the time of the Bat-son motion and in light of all subsequent voir dire testimony. See Wade, 202 F.3d at 1198 (examining the complete voir dire…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Miller-El v. DretkeSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by94 opinions
- Robert Murray v. Dora SchriroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Butler v. CurryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Crittenden v. AyersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- State v. TurnidgeOregon Supreme Court · 2016
- Smulls v. RoperCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.