Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Frie

Suffolk County District Court

Decided July 10, 1996PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*408OPINION OF THE COURT

Madeleine A. Fitzgibbon, J.

Defendant seeks dismissal on constitutional grounds of the charges against her, asserting the accusatory instruments are defective because the antinoise ordinance which she is charged with violating, Smithtown Town Code § 207-2 (B) (2), is void for vagueness under the Due Process Clauses in the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution and article I, § 6 of the New York Constitution (CPL 170.30 [1] [a]; 170.35 [1] [c]).

Each accusatory instrument is a separate charge against defendant for violating Smithtown Town Code § 207-2 (B) (2),…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. CruzNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. People v. IllardoNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. People v. ByronNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
  4. People v. New York Trap Rock Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. People v. BakolasNew York Court of Appeals · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Town of Baldwin v. CarterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002
  2. People v. DonatoNew Rochelle City Court · 1998
  3. People v. LordAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2005
  4. People v. StephensAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  5. People v. StephensAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API