Legal Opinion

Hunt v. Hurst

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 1, 1926PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Appellee was employed by appellant as a common laborer in constructing a derrick to be used in drilling for oil. He was what was known, in oil field parlance, as a “roustabout,” it being his business to help do whatever was required to be done. He had worked in a similar capacity for several oil companies. One morning, about an hour after appellee commenced work, he was directed by his foreman to take a hatchet, which was lying on the derrick floor, and nail a brace on the jack-post. Appellee picked up the hatchet and some twenty-penny nails, which were about five inches long, and got a piece…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
  2. Fordyce Lumber Co. v. LynnSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
  3. Arnold v. Doniphan Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
  4. Arkansas Central Railroad v. GoadSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
  5. Royal v. White Oil Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. StewartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
  2. Warren & Ouachita Valley Railway Co. v. EderingtonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API