Legal Opinion

Wingate v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 26, 1999No. 98-1470PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is not properly raised on direct appeal, particularly in light of the enactment of section 924.051, Florida Statutes (Supp.1996). See McKinney v. State, 579 So.2d 80 (Fla.1991); Gibson v. State, 351 So.2d 948 (Fla.1977); State v. Barber, 301 So.2d 7 (Fla.1974); Dennis v. State, 696 So.2d 1280 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). We therefore affirm without prejudice to appellant bringing the claim in an appropriate proceeding under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.

We find the evidence sufficient to sustain appellant’s conviction for tampering…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. BarberSupreme Court of Florida · 1974
  2. McKinney v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  3. Gibson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1977
  4. Dennis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  5. McKenzie v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kidd v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
  2. Cobb v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  3. Mathis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  4. Sheena Latson v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  5. Sheena Latson v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API