Wingate v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
Appellant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is not properly raised on direct appeal, particularly in light of the enactment of section 924.051, Florida Statutes (Supp.1996). See McKinney v. State, 579 So.2d 80 (Fla.1991); Gibson v. State, 351 So.2d 948 (Fla.1977); State v. Barber, 301 So.2d 7 (Fla.1974); Dennis v. State, 696 So.2d 1280 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). We therefore affirm without prejudice to appellant bringing the claim in an appropriate proceeding under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.
We find the evidence sufficient to sustain appellant’s conviction for tampering…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. BarberSupreme Court of Florida · 1974
- McKinney v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
- Gibson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1977
- Dennis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- McKenzie v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kidd v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
- Cobb v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- Mathis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- Sheena Latson v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- Sheena Latson v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016