Sheena Latson v. State of Florida

In' this appeal,.appellant does not raise a single claim of preserved error or even a claim that any error below is fundamental; *1072Instead, appellant identifies numerous alleged specific instances of “ineffective assistance of counsel on the face of the record,” and seeks correction of a scrivener’s error that she never asked the trial court to correct. I concur in the majority opinion, but write separately to discuss the growing frequency of claims of “ineffective assistance of counsel on the face of the record” as an unjustifiable substitute for claims of fundamental error.

A. Appellate review…