Legal Opinion
People v. Machlowitz
Nassau County District Court
Decided February 25, 1966PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFrancis J. Donovan, J.
On defendants’ application after impaneling of the jury, a hearing was held before the court alone to consider the validity of an order of a County Judge which had authorized interception of communications transmitted over a telephone listed in the name of defendant, Inzerillo.
Defendants contend: (1) The District Court lacks power or jurisdiction to review or examine a wiretap order of a County Judge and must therefore refer the matter to the County Court for such purpose; (2) that the order is invalid for insufficiency of the affidavit and petition on which it was granted; (3) the order and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Claim of Doey v. Clarence P. Howland Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Claim of Sullivan v. Hudson Navigation Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
- People v. GrossmanNew York Supreme Court · 1965
- People v. BeshanyNew York Supreme Court · 1964
- Matter of Anderson v. . Johnson Lighterage CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. SossaCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1974
- People v. BetorAlbany City Police Court · 1967