Gilmer v. Griffin
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
NORVELL, Justice.
This is ah automobile collision case in which judgment was rendered against Claud Gilmer, the defendant -below. Gil-mer’s primary contentions are that the evidence was insufficient in law and in fact to support the jury’s findings that he was negligent in certain particulars and that the answers to some of the special issues are conflicting.. Certain additional contentions are brought forward, which will also be discussed. In order to dispose of the two contentions first mentioned it is necessary to make a statement of the undisputed facts and the jury’s findings.
The…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- City of Houston v. QuinonesTexas Supreme Court · 1944
- Southern Ice & Utilities Co. v. RichardsonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1936
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. GiunTexas Supreme Court · 1938
- Southern Ice & Utilities Co. v. RichardsonTexas Supreme Court · 1936
- Houston Oxygen Co. v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1942
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Dennis v. HulseTexas Supreme Court · 1962
- Graham v. WristonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1961
- Roth v. LawCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Ex Parte JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1960
- Serna v. CochrumCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.