Legal Opinion

Shipe v. Norfolk & Western Ry Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 28, 1935No. 2563PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By BARNES, PJ.

The court’s determination in entering judgment in favor of the defendant was based on the fact that the regulations to which the plaintiff had subscribed in his application for membership, contained the provision that’ the determination of the Medical Examiner that he was able to work on June 19, 1926, was a final determination of a material fact involved, save and except the right of appeal, as provided in Regulation 62. Also that the appeal, being denied in the first instance by the Superintendent and later by the Advisory Committee, there was invoked the following, as…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. Liverpool, London & Globe InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Pennsylvania Co. v. Reager's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  3. Reager's Administratrix v. Pennsylvania Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  4. Adams v. RutherfordOregon Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Lehman v. HarveyOhio Court of Appeals · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McHorse v. Portland General Electric CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Lane v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Enginemen & FiremenOregon Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Bates v. Pennsylvania RdOhio Court of Appeals · 1937
  4. Gallagher v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & EnginemenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  5. McHorse v. Portland General Electric CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API