Legal Opinion

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co.

District Court, W.D. Tennessee

Decided May 19, 2009No. 07-2450 Ma/PPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER

TU M. PHAM, United States Magistrate Judge.

Before the court by order of reference is plaintiff Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s (“EEOC”) Motion for Protective Order. (D.E. 28.) In this employment discrimination case brought under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. § 12117(a), the EEOC alleges that defendant Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Company (“BNSF”) engaged in discrimination in its employment practices when it failed to return Emerson Payne to his position as a conductor or “trainman” based on his…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Department of the Interior v. Klamath Water Users Protective Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Redland Soccer Club, Inc. v. Department of the Army of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  4. National Wildlife Federation v. United States Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  5. In Re Franklin National Bank Securities LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2009
  2. Libertarian Party v. HustedDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2014
  3. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Wabash National CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API