Legal Opinion

State v. Childress

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 8, 1987No. 52811PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARL R. GAERTNER, Judge.

Defendant was found guilty of illegally possessing a Schedule I Controlled Substance in violation of section 196.020, RSMo. 1986. Defendant appeals on two points: (1) the trial court erred by refusing to sustain appellant’s motion to strike for cause eight venirepersons; and (2) the trial court erred by overruling defendant’s motions for acquittal because the state failed to prove that defendant knowingly and intentionally possessed the controlled substance. We affirm.

The state’s witnesses testified as follows. On the afternoon of May 16, 1986, two plainclothes…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. StewartSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985
  2. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1986
  3. State v. DethrowMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. State v. FranksMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. State v. WilliamsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Childress-Bey v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. State v. JonesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. State v. BrothertonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API