Legal Opinion

Still v. Eastman Chemical Co.

Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)

Decided August 16, 2005No. 06-04-00122-CVPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Chief Justice MORRISS.

All-terrain vehicles, including four-wheelers and other motorized vehicles, using the ATV Park operated by Oscar War-don Still, Future Income L.L.C., Rabbit Creek Mountain Mud Blast, Rabbit Creek ATV-RV Park, and East Texas All-Terrain Monsters (collectively Still), ranged over Still’s land, as well as over the pipelines buried in five pipeline easements crossing his land. Soon after personnel of Eastman Chemical Company and En-bridge Pipelines (East Texas), L.P. (collectively Appellees), noticed erosion and rutting of the soil over and adjacent to the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Davis v. HueyTexas Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Gannon v. PayneTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Flagship Hotel, Ltd. v. City of Galveston, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2003
  5. Harbor Perfusion, Inc. v. Floyd, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2001

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Thoyakulathu v. Brennan, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2006
  2. Brookshire Katy Drainage District v. Lily Gardens, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2011
  3. Fuqua v. Oncor Electric Delivery Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2010
  4. Angela Mae Brannan, Individually and as Independent of the Estate of Bob Albert Brannan v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2010
  5. Brookshire Katy Drainage District v. Lily Gardens, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2011

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API