Legal Opinion

Stringham v. Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 25, 1923No. 11,617PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRemy, J.

Suit by appellants to enjoin appellees from obstructing an alleged public highway. The court found the facts specially, and stated its conclusions of law thereon in favor of appellees. The questions, which under the rules of this court, have been, presented by appellants for determination, arise on an exception to the conclusions of law.

Appellants by their complaint aver, among other things, that they are tenants in common of a tract of real estate, and that a certain described road furnishes them the only way of ingress and egress to and from- such real estate; that the road is a public…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Shellhouse v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. O'Connell v. Chicago Terminal Transfer RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Tucker v. ConradIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Town of Brushy Mound v. McClintockIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Null v. WilliamsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1906

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Deshields v. JoestIndiana Court of Appeals · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API