Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Neumiller

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 7, 2014No. 31299-2-IIIPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKorsmo, J.

¶1 In a marriage dissolution proceeding, does one party have to plead the existence of a premarital committed intimate relationship in order to consider that relationship when characterizing property as separate or community? Appellant Dawn Neumiller appeals from the dissolution of her marriage to respondent Steven Neu-miller, alleging several errors at trial. We agree only with her contention that the trial court should have considered evidence of the existence of a committed intimate relationship before characterizing the two most significant assets before the court and remand for the trial…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Carroll v. JunkerWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Baker v. BakerWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  3. State v. RundquistCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
  4. Wilson v. HorsleyWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  5. In Re the Marriage of WashburnWashington Supreme Court · 1984

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Angela Freeman v. Oscar FreemanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  2. In Re: Nicolaas Devogel, V. Heidi PadillaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2022
  3. In the Matter of the Marriage of: Benjamin E. Jones & Lisa A.M. JonesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  4. In the Matter of the Marriage of: Mary Alice Carlson & Hugh David CarlsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  5. Maria A. Pena Avila v. Gumersindo Quin CamposCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API