Legal Opinion

Theesfeld v. Image Electrolysis & Skin Care, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 24, 2005No. A05A1006PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDREWS, Presiding Judge.

Sherrie Theesfeld sued Image Electrolysis & Skin Care, Inc. d/b/a Image Spa alleging that she was injured on the Image Spa premises while working as an invitee independent contractor for Image Spa. She alleged that Image Spa negligently failed to maintain a stool located on the premises in a safe condition, and that, when she sat on the stool, she fell off and was injured. Theesfeld appeals from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Image Spa. For the following reasons, we affirm.

Image Spa sought summary judgment on two grounds. First, Image Spa…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lau's Corp., Inc. v. HaskinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  2. City of Gainesville v. DoddSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002
  3. McFadden Business Publications, Inc. v. GuidryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  4. Gantt v. Dave & Buster's of Georgia, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  5. Ridley v. MonroeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Luong v. TranCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  2. Petrosky v. EMBRY CROSSING CONDOMINIUM ASS'N, INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  3. Postnieks v. Chick-Fil-A, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  4. Postnieks v. Chick-Fil-A, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API