Legal Opinion
PHH Mortgage Corp. v. Prater
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided September 6, 2012No. 2011-1526PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLundberg Stratton, J.
{¶ 1} Today we are called upon to consider whether a county sheriff can meet the constitutional obligation of providing notice of a sheriffs sale to a plaintiff by letter directing the plaintiffs attorney to monitor a website for a listing of the date, time, and location of sale. Because we answer in the negative, we reverse the judgment of the court of appeals.
Facts and Procedural Posture
{¶ 2} On April 14, 2008, PHH Mortgage Corporation (“PHH”), plaintiff-appellant, filed a foreclosure action against Michael S. Prater. PHH later filed a motion for default judgment, which was granted along…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Mennonite Board of Missions v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Central Trust Co. v. JensenOhio Supreme Court · 1993
3Cited by14 opinions
- Boulder Capital Group, Inc. v. LawsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- In re J.T.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019
- Amir v. WernerOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- Fonce v. KabinierOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
- Safety 4th Fireworks, Inc. v. Liberty Twp. Bd. of TrusteesOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.