Legal Opinion

City of Jordan v. Nicolin

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 15, 1901No. Nos. 12,782—(73)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of tbe district court for Scott county, Cadwell, J., affirming a judgment of a justice of tbe peace before whom defendant was convicted of tbe offense of keeping open bis saloon in violation of an ordinance of plaintiff city.

1Opinion of the Court

START, O. J.

Tbe defendant was convicted in justice court of a second violation of tbe same ordinance wbicb we held to be valid in tbe case of City of Jordan v. Nicolin, supra, page 367. He appealed from tbe judgment of tbe justice to tbe district court of the county of Scott, and from tbe judgment of tbe district court affirming tbe conviction be appealed to this court.

There is one question raised by tbe record in this case wbicb was not presented by tbe record in tbe other case. Tbe question arises upon tbe claim of tbe defendant that tbe prosecution failed to prove by any competent evidence…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. GillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  2. State v. HoustonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
  3. State v. CollinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API