STEFANIK v. City of Holyoke
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MICHAEL A. PONSOR, District Judge.
Upon de novo review, this Report and Recommendations is hereby adopted, without objection. Docket No. 9 in 08cv30106 is denied. Docket No. 13 in 08ev30107 is denied. So ordered.
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION WITH REGARD TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR REMAND (Document No. 9 in 08cv30106-MAP and Document No. 13 in 08cv30107-MAP)
December 11, 2008
NEIMAN, United States Chief Magistrate Judge.
Presently before the court is Thomas Stefanik (“Plaintiff’)’s three complaints against various individuals associated with the City of Holyoke (“the City”), as well as against the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Emiliano Valencia-CopeteCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
- Park Motor Mart, Inc. v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
- Thermtron Products, Inc. v. HermansdorferSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Bruce W. KEATING, Sr., Plaintiff, Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Pineiro v. ORIENTAL GROUPDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2010
- Valley Management, Inc. v. Boston Road Mobile Home Park Tenants Ass'nDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2010
- Ardaneh v. Norfolk District AttorneyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2025
- BSI 254 Westfield, LLC v. FiorilloDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2023
- Delpidio v. FiorilloDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2023
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.