Legal Opinion
Northwestern Nat. Ins. v. McFarlane
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 1, 1931No. 6377PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILBUR, Circuit Judge.
This is an action brought to recover on a policy of fire insurance. At the time the building covered by the insurance policy was burned the property was vacant and had been vacant for several months, from March, 1929, to August 11, 1929, the date of the fire. The policy, ■ a statutory standard form used in California (Stat. of Cal. 1909, p. 404), provided as follows: “Matters suspending insurance. Unless otherwise provided by agreement endorsed hereon or added hereto this company shall not be liable for loss or damage occurring * * * (f) while a building herein described…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Insurance Co. v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Northern Assurance Co. v. Grand View Building Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Carpenter v. Providence Washington InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
- Insurance Co. v. MowrySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Aetna Life Insurance v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp. v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
- Morgan Stivers v. National American Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- Alexander v. General Ins. Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1938
- Eddy v. National Union Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
- Cinema Schools, Inc. v. Federal Union Ins.District Court, S.D. California · 1932
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.