Mercury Insurance Co. of Florida v. Fonseca
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtCortinas, J.
Appellee, Miguel Fonseca, was injured in a car accident allegedly caused by a policyholder of Appellant, Mercury Insurance Company of Florida. Fonseca sued the policyholder, who raised the existence of a settlement as an affirmative defense. In a separate action, Mercury sought a declaratory judgment recognizing the validity of the same settlement. The trial court consolidated the two cases. The single issue on appeal is whether correspondence between Fonseca and Mercury was sufficient to form a settlement. The trial court held that it was not. We disagree and reverse.
After the accident,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Robbie v. City of MiamiSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
- Erhardt v. DuffDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
- Etheredge v. BarkleySupreme Court of Florida · 1889
- Nichols v. MartellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
- Peraza v. RoblesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Grant v. LyonsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
- Gonzalez v. ClaywellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
- Wallen v. TysonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
- Marin v. Infinity Auto Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- Adonel Concrete Corp. v. Randy FurshmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2026
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.