Legal Opinion

Grant v. Lyons

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 3, 2009No. 4D08-703PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarner, J.

The trial court granted a defendant’s motion to enforce settlement of a personal injury action, because it found that the insurance company had complied with the policy limit demand of the appellant/plaintiff. Because the release that the insurance company submitted with its payment was not a routine general release, we hold that the insurance company had not accepted the demand of the appellant. We reverse.

Appellant filed a complaint for personal injury damages against Matthew Lyons, with whom appellant was involved in an automobile accident. Appellant then filed a time limit demand to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. NicholsSupreme Court of Florida · 2006
  2. Nehleber v. AnzaloneDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  3. Cheverie v. GeisserDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  4. Nichols v. Hartford Ins. Co. of the MidwestDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  5. Erhardt v. DuffDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Pena v. FoxDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
  2. Kuehlman v. Bank of America, N.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
  3. ANIBAL TOVAR v. JENNIKA RUSSELLDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
  4. Australian Therapeutic Supplies Pty. Ltd. v. Naked TM LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2023
  5. FONT & NELSON, PLLC v. PATH MEDICAL, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2021

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API