Mateer v. Swissvale Borough
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Maxey,
By bill in equity two taxpayers of Swissvale Borough sought to enjoin the borough, its members of council, its burgess and a bidder, from executing and carrying out the terms of an agreement for the disposal of the garbage and rubbish in the borough. The bill complained of, inter alia, the '“failure to advertise for bids in a newspaper circulating generally in the borough; failure to enact an ordinance authorizing the contract, and abuse of discretion by council.” A responsive an swer denying the complaints was duly filed by the Borough and its officials, but the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Morganstern Electric Co. v. BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Nuebling to Use v. Topton Boro.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Millvale BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
- Wilkes-Barre Connecting Railroad v. Kingston BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Fingal v. Millvale Boro.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
3Cited by9 opinions
- Pacella v. Washington County Tax Claim BureauCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Sunland Pub. Co., Inc. v. City of JacksonMississippi Supreme Court · 1998
- Erie Municipal Airport Authority v. Automation Devices, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Borough of Coopersburg v. Cliff, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lehigh County1958
- Crouse v. Borough of Riegelsville, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County1974
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.